میراث جنوب‌ غربی آسیا

میراث جنوب‌ غربی آسیا

آرایه‌های لایه‌چینی در معماری ایران: تحلیلی بر فناوری‌های ساخت

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسنده
دانشیار، پژوهشکدۀ ابنیه و بافت‌های تاریخی، پژوهشگاه میراث فرهنگی و گردشگری، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
آرایه‌های لایه‌چینی که معمولاً طلاچسبانی نیز می‌شده‌اند از جمله هنرهای ویژه و ارزشمند دوره صفویان بوده ‌است. در دورۀ تیموریان نیز در حد بسیار محدود این‌گونه از آرایه معماری اجرا ‌شده (مانند مسجد شاه مشهد و مقبره خواجه یوسف در مدرسه دو در مشهد)، ولی اوج آن‌هم از نظر کیفیت و هم از نظر کمیت در دوره صفویه اجرا شده است. اینکه لایه‌چینی در کاخ‌های مسلمانان اجرا شده یا در کلیساهای ارمنیان و یا اینکه این آرایه در مرکز ایران اجرا شده یا شمال غرب یا شرق ایران، آیا در مواد و مصالح و همچنین در شیوه عمل‌آوری مواد، تفاوت‌هایی وجود داشته یا در همه‌جا با یک گونه مواد با یک نوع عمل‌آوری اجرا شده است؟ هدف این پژوهش، بررسی پژوهش‌های انجام شده و همچنین گردآوری نتیجه مطالعات میدانی انجام شده برای دستیابی به شناخت فن‌شناختی آرایه‌های لایه‌چینی در گزیده‌ای از بناهای دورۀ صفویه است. در قدم اول منابع مکتوب منتشر شده و منتشر نشده مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته و بررسی میدانی از نزدیک بر روی آرایه‌های لایه‌چینی بناهای: مسجد شاه و مقبره خواجه یوسف مشهد، چهل‌ستون اصفهان، عالی‌قاپوی اصفهان، هشت‌بهشت، تالار اشرف اصفهان، کلیسای وانک و بیت‌لحم، چهل‌ستون قزوین، بقعه شیخ جبرائیل کلخوران انجام پذیرفته است. در ادامه، هم نتایج آزمایشگاهی و هم نتایج مطالعات میدانی مورد بحث قرار گرفته است. نسبت گچ به گل سرخ در آرایه‌های لایه‌چینی این بناها شناسایی شده است. درصد تقریبی آن و همچنین مواد افزوده معدنی نیز شناسایی و مورد مطالعه تطبیقی قرار گرفته است. نوع بست لایه‌چینی، شیوه طلاکاری و چسب طلاکاری نیز مورد بررسی قرار گرفت.
 
 

چکیده تصویری

آرایه‌های لایه‌چینی در معماری ایران: تحلیلی بر فناوری‌های ساخت

تازه های تحقیق

 

🎙️گوینده پادکست: شبنم شلویری، بخش رسانه نشریه میراث جنوب غربی آسیا

 

  •        برای نخستین‌بار ساختار فنی و مواد به‌کاررفته در آرایه‌های چینی و طلاچسبان معماری ایران به‌صورت میان‌رشته‌ای بررسی شده است.
  •        پژوهش با اتکا به مطالعات میدانی و آنالیزهای آزمایشگاهی پیشرفته مانند XRD، SEM-EDS و FTIR انجام شده است.
  •        ترکیب اصلی لایه‌ها شامل گچ، گل‌سرخ، ایلیت، مسکوویت و روغن بزرک است که نقش اساسی در چسبندگی و درخشش ورق طلا دارند.
  •        نتایج نشان می‌دهد روش‌های اجرایی آرایه‌های صفوی در بناهای مختلف مشابه و استاندارد بوده‌اند.
  •        فن چینی و طلاچسبانی در دوره صفویه به اوج رسید و در برخی بناهای ارمنی اصفهان نیز با همکاری هنرمندان ایرانی به کار رفت.
  •        این هنر اکنون در معرض فراموشی است و شناخت فنی آن برای حفاظت و مرمت علمی آثار تاریخی ضروری است.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

1. Introduction

Architecture is one of the most prominent manifestations of any civilization, and its ornamental components constitute a major element influencing both meaning and perception. Architectural ornaments form the outermost layer of interior and exterior surfaces and may be integral to the structure or added afterward. They serve conceptual, aesthetic, and/or protective functions; without such functions, they cannot be considered true ornaments. Among the various materials employed, gypsum-based mortars have played a central role.

     Pastiglia (layeh-chini) represents one of the most striking relief arts, particularly in Safavid Iran, where its brilliant red grounds and gold leaf created a distinctive visual effect. Although earlier examples exist, its use reached a peak in quantity and quality during the Safavid period. Defined as building up multiple red-tinted layers to create high-relief motifs for subsequent gilding, Pastiglia has been variously regarded as an Italian import or an indigenous Iranian craft. Because over half of its composition is gypsum, it is classified among plaster ornaments.

Despite its artistic value, Pastiglia is labor-intensive and increasingly neglected, leading to its gradual disappearance. Accurate documentation of its materials, techniques, and regional variations is therefore crucial for conservation and restoration. Yet, despite the abundance of surviving masterpieces, rigorous technological studies with laboratory evidence remain scarce, making systematic research essential for preserving this 500-year-old heritage and understanding its historical development.

     Given that Pastiglia is among the arts at risk of being forgotten, and that the conservation and restoration of these works require precise knowledge of their constituent elements and fabrication details, research, documentation, and technical characterization of these ornaments — many of which are over 500 years old — appear essential. It should be noted that Pastiglia-like ornaments were executed on the Dome of Soltaniyeh in Zanjan; however, no thorough technical study has yet been conducted on those features, and a dedicated future research project is warranted. Based on available information, it can currently be stated that the oldest examples of Pastiglia in Iranian architecture are preserved in two Shahrukh-Timurid period monuments in Mashhad (the Shah Mosque and the tomb of Khwaja Yusuf).

2. Methodology

This study reviews Pastiglia (layeh-chini) ornaments of major Safavid monuments, including ʿAlī Qāpū, Chehel Sotoun (Isfahan and Qazvin), Hasht Behesht, Talār-e Ashraf, Vank and Bethlehem Churches, and the shrine of Shaykh Amīn-al-Dīn Jabrāʾīl (Kalkhoran). Previous case studies employed diverse analytical techniques XRD, XRF, SEM-EDS, FTIR, GC/MS, Raman, Py-GC/MS combined with digital, optical, and scanning electron microscopy and classical chemistry to identify organic and mineral components. In the present research, these findings are integrated and content-analysed to provide comprehensive technological information on Safavid Pastiglia ornaments.

3. Background

Pastiglia is a craft technique whose primary purpose is to produce a raised background for gilding (Holakuee, 2009). Several studies have been carried out on Pastiglia and gilded ornaments of Safavid and pre- and post-Safavid monuments. Among them, ājī-Seyyed-Javadi et al. (2020a) examined and identified the mineral components of Pastiglia and gilded ornaments from the Safavid period in Chehel Sotoun Palace, Qazvin. Tīnati et al. (2020), in an article titled “Structural Analysis of Pastiglia Gilded Ornaments in Vank and Bethlehem Churches, Isfahan,” conducted a fully technical structural study. ājī-Seyyed-Javadi et al. (2020b) in Investigation and Identification of Organic Components of Pastiglia and Gilding in the Safavid Period, Chehel Sotoun Palace in Qazvin” analyzed the organic materials present in Pastiglia ornaments.

     In “Technical Study of Gilded Ornaments on the Stone Inscriptions of Vank Cathedral, Isfahan,” Motasham (2017) introduced the oil-mediated gold leaf technique using SEM-EDS and FTIR analyses. In Identification and Conservation of Painted Inscriptions of the Eastern Kiriyās of the Great Congregational Mosque of Yazd,” amzavi et al. (2015) reported the use of gold leaf in the painted inscriptions of the Great Congregational Mosque of Yazd and in the decorative mural of the Sāti Fāemeh shrine from the Timurid period. In Discovery of an Ancient Inscription in Vank Cathedral, Isfahan, amzavi (2014) discussed the Pastiglia and gilding of this building, which contains one of the largest volumes of Pastiglia and gilding in Iran. In “Gilding of Cast Plaster Ornaments in the Seyyed Rokn-al-Dīn Shrine, Yazd,” amzavi et al. (2013) identified and introduced a particular type of gilding using tin foil with a transparent yellow covering during the Muzaffarid period.

     Karimi and Vatankhah (2014) identified painting binders in Iran using wet-chemistry methods. In “Architectural Ornaments of the Tomb Chamber of the Historical Building of Pir-Bakran and Its Hidden Inscription,” amzavi and Moazeni (2013) studied gilding on a plaster inscription from the Ilkhanid period. In “Technical Examination of Pastiglia Gilded Ornaments of the Safavid Period in Isfahan with Emphasis on the Pastiglia of ʿAlī Qāpū, Chehel Sotoun and Hasht Behesht, Holakuee et al. (2009), after a brief review of Pastiglia terminology and the history of raised gilded ornaments in Europe and Iran, investigated the history and technique of execution in these three monuments.

4. Study of Pastiglia Ornamentation in the Examined Monuments

A: Chehel Sotoun Palace, Isfahan: The vast garden of Chehel Sotoun was initiated by Shah ʿAbbās I, and its pavilion with surrounding rooms was built in his time; the grand halls date from Shah ʿAbbās IIs reign and served for official receptions. During 1956, repairs three painted rooms were uncovered (Honarfar, 1971). Wall paintings from both monarchs are classified into three styles and four periods (Aghajani Efahānī & Javani, 2007). Flandin admired its intact state under Moammad-Shāh Qājār (Honarfar, 1971); Madame Dieulafoy in 1881 praised its gilded raised ornaments (Honarfar, 1971). The halls, rooms, porticoes, and ceiling combine extensive Pastiglia with gilding (Holakuee, 2009; Razanī, 2009). In many areas, the gold leaf has disappeared, leaving only the red Pastiglia visible (Fig. 1).

 

Figure 1. Pastiglia and gilding arrangements in various sections of the Chehel Sotoun Palace, Isfahan.

 

B: ʿĀlī-Qāpū Palace, Isfahan: Built by Shah ʿAbbās I in the early 17th century as the royal government house (Dawlat-Khānah-yi Mubārakah-yi Naqsh-i Jahān”), the exact dates of construction and completion remain uncertain, though it was likely finished near the time of Shaykh Luf-Allāh Mosque. Chardin described two superimposed decorative layers those of Shah ʿAbbās II and later additions by Shah Sulān usayn covered during the late Qajar period (Honarfar, 1971). Pietro Della Valle praised its gilded miniature paintings (Godard et al., 1992). In ʿĀlī-Qāpū, Pastiglia and gilding are most abundant on the third and sixth floors; in parts, only the red Pastiglia remains, while some third-floor work was never gilded. The sixth-floor features extensive Pastiglia on the so-called “Tang-bori” stucco (Fig. 2).

 

Figure 2. Pastiglia and gilding arrangements on the third and sixth floors of the Ali Qapu Palace, Isfahan.

 

C: Hasht Behesht Palace, Isfahan: Built in 1669 during Shah Soleymān’s reign, Hasht Behesht served as a pavilion for princes. Decorative motifs were executed with limited Pastiglia and stucco, mainly painted. Pastiglia and gilding appear in the central ceiling’s muqarnas, room borders, and wooden ceiling panels, including a gilded iris bouquet (Honarfar, 1971) (Fig. 3).

 

 

Figure 3. Pastiglia and gilding arrangements in the Hasht Behesht Palace, Isfahan.

D: Vank (Surp Amenapergich) Church, Isfahan: Located in Jolfa, Isfahan, Vank Church was built 1655–1664 on a 1606 chapel site and consecrated by Bishop David (Hagh-Nazaryan, 2006; Ashjian, 1975; Ghokassian, 1972). Pastiglia and gilding, applied in 1667 (amzavi, 2014), decorate the dome, nave, and apse with intricate Iranian-style motifs influenced by Italian art (Nercissians, 2012; Hovian, 2005) (Fig. 4).

 

 

 

Figure 4. Pastiglia and gilding arrangements in the Vank Cathedral.

 

E: Bethlehem Church, Isfahan: Founded in 1627 by Khwāja Petrus and completed in 1646, Bethlehem Church features the tallest dome among Jolfa’s twelve historic churches (Nercissians, 2012; Hovsepian, 2007; Hagh-Nazaryan, 2006; Carswell, 1968). The dome and interior walls display Pastiglia and gilding with arabesque motifs. These ornaments predate Vank Church and likely influenced its design, with active contribution from Iranian artisans (Figs. 5 & 6).

 

 

Figure 5. Pastiglia and gilding arrangements on the dome of the Bethlehem Church.

 

Figure 6. Pastiglia and gilding arrangements in the dome chamber of the Bethlehem Church.

F: Chehel Sotoun Palace, Qazvin: Qazvin, Safavid capital 1555–1606, hosts Chehel Sotoun Palace, an octagonal structure with interior and exterior wall paintings from Shah Tāhmāsb’s reign, later modified under Shah ʿAbbās and the Qajar period (Parhizgari, 2012). Pastiglia and gilded stucco panels survive partially; some removed for preservation on wooden panels (Fig. 7). Three decorative layers reflect sequential Safavid–Qajar interventions.

 

 

Figure 7. Pastiglia and gilding arrangements (on the building and wooden panel) of the Chehel Sotoun Palace, Qazvin.

 

G: Sheikh Amin‑al-Din Jebra’il Mausoleum, Kalkhoran: Located in Kalkhoran, the mausoleum dates to 1602 (1011 AH) with repairs under Shah ʿAbbās I (Alaei, 1964; Hillenbrand, 1994; Sarre, 1924; Weaver, 1976). Stucco ornaments, red-brown carved motifs, and exceptional muqarnas ceilings reflect Safavid architectural mastery. Two dated inscriptions confirm original construction and subsequent restorations (Figs. 8, 9, 10).

 

Figure 8. Two dated plaster inscriptions bearing the names of the artists in the dome chamber of the Mausoleum of Sheikh Jabra’il.

Figure 9. Pastiglia and gilding arrangements in the Mausoleum of Sheikh Jabra’il, Kalkhoran, Ardabil.

 

 

 

Figure 10. Pastiglia and gilding arrangements in the Mausoleum of Sheikh Jabra’il, Kalkhoran, Ardabil.

 

H: Ashraf Hall, Isfahan: Located in the governorate area, Ashraf Hall, built under Shah ʿAbbās II and completed under Shah Soleymān, comprises a central hall (14×14m) flanked by two side rooms (Honarfar, 1971; Pope & Ackermann, 1964; Rafiei Mehrabadi, 1973). Pastiglia with gilding dominates the central hall; side rooms were restored in 2014–2015. Stucco protected the ornaments during Qajar and early 20th-century uses (Fig. 11).

5. Analysis and Discussion

Until the late 2000s, Pastiglia was thought to rely solely on red clay (Gel-e Hormoz/Armeni). Technical studies in 1999 revealed that 50–75% of the material is gypsum; mixing gypsum with red clay prevents shrinkage cracks. A protein binder, likely Animal Glue, dissolved in warm water, was added. In Ali Qapu, Hasht Behesht, and Chehel Sotoun (Isfahan), gold leaf was applied via gilding with linseed or gum-oil. Vank and Bethlehem Churches follow a similar technique, with slightly different red clay content and higher quality results. Chehel Sotoun (Qazvin) uses more red clay and adds zinc oxide for smoother surfaces. Sheikh Jabra’il Mausoleum’s Pastiglia has roughly equal gypsum and red clay, gilded with oil, comparable to other studied sites.

 

 

 

Figure 11. Pastiglia and gilding arrangements in the Ashraf Hall, Isfahan.

 

Table 1. Technical and Material Composition Features in the Pastiglia and Gilding of Iranian Historic Monuments.

Studied Building

Gypsum to Red Clay Ratio

Approx. % Fe₂O₃

Mineral Additives

Binder Type

Pastiglia

Gilding Technique

Gold Adhesive

Chehel Sotoun Palace, Isfahan

3:1

6.8

-

Animal Glue

-

Gold leaf application

Oil (Linseed oil or Kaman oil)

Ali Qapu Palace, Isfahan

3:1

5.1

-

Animal Glue

-

Gold leaf application

Oil (Linseed oil or Kaman oil)

Hasht Behesht Palace

3:2

9.32

Calcite (powdered)

Animal Glue

-

Gold leaf application

Oil (Linseed oil or Kaman oil)

Vank Church, Isfahan

3:1

4.46

-

Animal Glue

-

Gold leaf application

Linseed oil

Bethlehem Church, Isfahan

3:1

5.06

-

Animal Glue

-

Gold leaf application

Linseed oil

Chehel Sotoun Palace, Qazvin

3:2

1.8

Zinc oxide (white zinc)

Animal Glue

-

Gold leaf application

Linseed oil

Chehel Sotoun Palace, Qazvin

3:2

9.3

Zinc oxide (white zinc)

Animal Glue

-

Gold leaf application

Linseed oil

Sheikh Kalkhoran Shrine

3:2

8.6

-

Animal Glue

-

Gold leaf application

Kaman oil

 

     For the execution of Pastiglia, after completing the ground layer, the base layer, and the preparatory (priming) layer, the intended design was traditionally transferred onto the wall surface using pouncing and tracing techniques. To prepare the Pastiglia material, approximately 50% gypsum and 50% red clay were passed through a very fine sieve and thoroughly mixed. Animal glue (Serishom) was gently heated in water using indirect heat until dissolved. Based on the artisan’s experience, the glue was diluted with lukewarm water, and a small amount of grape sap was added; this addition was necessary to enhance flexibility, as Serishom alone tends to dry brittle and undergoes significant contraction. The prepared solution was poured into a container, and the gypsum–red clay mixture was gradually incorporated while stirring continuously. The consistency of the material had to be neither too stiff to work with a brush nor too fluid to run on the wall surface.

     Once ready, the Pastiglia was applied with a brush following the drawn patterns. Multiple applications were necessary to achieve the desired relief height, with the final layers being thinner to ensure a smooth and even surface. After the Pastiglia work was completed, gold leaf or copper alloys were adhered using either aqueous glue (Serishom) or oil-based adhesive (Kaman oil or linseed oil). Where required, polychrome painting was carried out; otherwise, brush finishing was applied. A protective topcoat, when applied, was typically Kaman oil.

6. Conclusion

During the Timurid and Safavid periods, in order to prevent cracking of the Pastiglia (relief plaster decoration), caused by the volumetric expansion of gypsum mortar during setting, gypsum was mixed with red clay (gel-e sorkh) to compensate for the shrinkage and cracking tendency of the clay. In addition to mineral materials, an organic adhesive was also essential. In the composition of the Pastiglia layers in the three monuments of Chehel Sotoun Palace (Isfahan), ʿAli Qapu Palace (Isfahan), and Hasht Behesht Palace (Isfahan), gypsum, red clay, and animal glue (Serishom) were used. The gypsum and red clay were first mixed in dry form, and instead of plain water, a warm aqueous solution containing dissolved animal glue was employed. In all three buildings, gilding was performed using the oil gilding technique, with linseed oil or kaman oil serving as the adhesive medium.

     The technique of executing Pastiglia decorations in the Vank and Bethlehem churches of Isfahan is similar to that observed in the aforementioned palaces. In terms of material composition, the Pastiglia layers of both churches correspond closely to those of ʿAli Qapu and Chehel Sotoun palaces, while differing slightly from Hasht Behesht Palace in the proportion of red clay used. In both churches, gilding was carried out by the oil gilding method, employing linseed oil. Based on the field observations and visual assessment of the studied samples, the Pastiglia decorations of the Vank and Bethlehem churches exhibit a higher level of quality and craftsmanship compared to the other examined monuments.

     The Pastiglia decorations of the Safavid period in Chehel Sotoun Palace of Qazvin were executed similarly to those in the Safavid monuments of Isfahan. In terms of composition, the proportions of gypsum and red clay in the two layers are comparable, showing the closest resemblance to those of Hasht Behesht Palace. In fact, in the Pastiglia of Chehel Sotoun Palace in Qazvin, a greater amount of red clay was used compared to the examples from Chehel Sotoun and ʿAli Qapu palaces in Isfahan. Gilding in both layers of the Qazvin palace was also executed using the oil gilding technique, employing oil as the adhesive agent.

     The Pastiglia decorations of the Sheikh Kalkhoran Mausoleum were carried out in the same manner as the other studied buildings. In terms of material composition, the ratio of gypsum to red clay was approximately equal, meaning that the amount of red clay was higher than that observed in the Pastiglia of Chehel Sotoun and ʿAli Qapu palaces. The gilding applied over the Pastiglia layer in the Sheikh Kalkhoran Mausoleum was of the oil gilding type, in which gold leaf was adhered using oil (probably kaman oil).

     For the execution of Pastiglia decoration, after completing the undercoat, bedding, and preparatory (ground) layers, the intended design was transferred onto the wall surface using traditional pouncing and stenciling techniques. To prepare the Pastiglia material, approximately equal parts (50%–50%) of gypsum and red clay were sieved through a fine mesh and thoroughly mixed. The animal glue was gently heated in water using indirect heat until fully dissolved. Based on the craftsman’s experience, the glue solution was diluted with warm water, and a small amount of grape syrup was added — the latter to increase flexibility and reduce the brittleness and shrinkage of the glue. A measured amount of this solution was poured into a vessel, and the gypsum–red clay mixture was gradually added while stirring continuously. The mixture’s viscosity had to be such that it was neither too thick for brush application nor too thin to cause dripping on the wall surface.

     Once the Pastiglia mixture was prepared, it was applied to the designated areas of the design using a brush. This process was repeated several times until the desired relief thickness was achieved. The uppermost layers were made more diluted to obtain a smooth and even surface. Upon completion of the Pastiglia, gold leaf or copper alloy foil was adhered to its surface using either an aqueous adhesive (animal glue) or an oil-based adhesive (linseed or kaman oil). Subsequently, if color application was required, it was performed; otherwise, fine outlining (qalamgiri) was executed. The final protective coating, when applied, usually consisted of kaman oil.

Material and spiritual supporters

The authors gratefully acknowledge all individuals and institutions whose material and spiritual support made this research possible. Special thanks are due to the organizations and laboratories that provided technical and financial assistance, as well as to colleagues and mentors whose intellectual guidance and moral encouragement greatly contributed to the completion of this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the authorship or publication of this article.

Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

 

 

 

 

 

 
Aghajani Esfahani, H. (1980). Painting restoration. Asar, 1(1), 79–90. (In Persian)
Aghajani Esfahani, H., & Javani, A. (2007). Safavid-era wall painting in Isfahan: Chehel Sotoun Palace. Tehran: Academy of Arts. (In Persian)
Alaei, A. A. (1964). Sheikh Jabra'il Mausoleum. Honar va Mardom, (18), 20–23. (In Persian)
Ashjian, M. V. (1975). Album All Saviours Cathedral, New Julfa, Iran. Diocesan Council of Armenians in Iran and India.
Carswell, J. (1968). New Julfa: The Armenian churches and other buildings. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Galdieri, E. (1982). Ali Qapu (A. Jabal Ameli, Trans.). Tehran: Iranian Cultural Heritage Organization. (In Persian)
Godard, A., et al. (1992). The art of Iran (M. Heron, Trans.). New York–Washington: Frederick A. Praeger. (In Persian)
Ghokassian, H. (1972). Vank Church, Julfa, Isfahan. Armaghan, 11–12, 800–804. (In Persian)
Ghirshman, R. (1971). Iranian art in the Parthian and Sassanian periods (B. Farhoushi, Trans.). Tehran: Translation & Publication Institute. (In Persian)
Hagh Nazarian, A. (2006). Armenian churches of New Julfa, Isfahan. Tehran: Academy of Arts. (In Persian)
ājī-Seyyed-Javadi, S. M., Fahimifar, A., & Hamzavi, Y. (2020a). Study and recognition of the mineral matter of the pastiglia layer and the gilding of the Safavid period in Qazvin Chehel Sotoun. Archaeological Research of Iran, 10(25), 225–240. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2019.20259.2027
ājī-Seyyed-Javadi, S. M., Fahimifar, A., & Hamzavi, Y. (2020b). Investigation and recognition of organic materials of the pastiglia layer and gilding of the Safavid period in Chehel Sotoun Palace of Qazvin. Journal of Restoration Archaeology (JRA), 6(2), 157–173. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.52547/jra.6.2.157
Hamzavi, Y. (2014). Finding an old inscription in Vank (Surp Amenaprgich) Cathedral in Isfahan. Restoration Science and Cultural Heritage, 2(4), 49–58. (In Persian) https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20150609105243-9874-77.pdf
Hamzavi, Y. (2022). Preparation and compilation of the framework for conservation and restoration of gypsum stucco ornaments in Iran [Unpublished research project]. Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism. (In Persian)
Hamzavi, Y., Akrami, M., & Salahshur, F. (2015). Study and investigation of the wall painting inscription layer in the eastern vestibule of the Yazd Jame Mosque and its restoration. Restoration Science and Cultural Heritage, 3(Special Issue), 35–52. (In Persian) https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20150609105306-9874-85.pdf
Hamzavi, Y., Salahshur, F., & Mozaffar, F. (2013). Gilding of molded gypsum stucco ornaments in the tomb of Seyed Rokn-od-Din, Yazd. Journal of Islamic Art Studies, (19), 111–121. (In Persian) https://www.sysislamicartjournal.ir/article_125687.html
Hamzavi, Y., & Moazeni, F. (2013). Architectural decorations in the tomb-chamber of Pir-e Baqran monument and its hidden inscriptions. Restoration Science and Cultural Heritage, 1(1), 1–11. (In Persian) https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20131203151320-9874-48.pdf
Hillenbrand, R. (1994). Islamic architecture: Form, function, and meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.
Holakuee, P., Abed Esfahani, A., Samanian, S., & Aslani, H. (2009). Technological study of the Laye-chini decorations (pastiglia) of Safavid monuments in Isfahan. Journal of Visual and Applied Arts, 1(2), 37–56. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.30480/vaa.2009.635
Honarfar, L. (1971). Treasury of historical monuments of Isfahan (2nd ed.). Tehran: Ziba Printing House. (In Persian)
Hovian, A. (2005). Armenians of Iran. Tehran: Hermes Publications.
Hovsepian, S. (2007). Church architecture of Isfahan. Peyman Cultural Quarterly, (40).
Karimi, A., & Vatankhah, G. (2014). A review of binder analysis methods in painting. In M. Razani & B. Ajorlou (Eds.), Selected papers of the First and Second National Conference on the Application of Scientific Analyses in Archaeometry and Conservation of Cultural Heritage, Islamic Art University of Tabriz (May 2012 & 2013) (pp. 165–198). Tabriz: Islamic Art University of Tabriz Press. https://jra-tabriziau.ir/files/site1/files/1-2-Archaeometry_samp/binder9.pdf
Mohtasham, A. (2017). Technical study of gilding ornaments on stony inscriptions in Vank Cathedral, Isfahan. Journal of Restoration Archaeology (JRA), 2(2), 77–89. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.29252/jra.2.2.77
Nercissians, E. (2012). The impact of mercantilism on the enhancement of painting in Julfa of Isfahan under the Safavid dynasty. Sociology of Art and Literature, 3(2), 55–73. (In Persian) https://jsal.ut.ac.ir/article_24612.html
Parhizgari, M. (2012). Chehel Sotoun. In Encyclopaedia Islamica (Vol. 19). Tehran: Encyclopaedia Islamica Center. (In Persian)
Pope, A., & Ackerman, P. (1964). A survey of Persian art: From prehistoric times to the present (Vol. 3). Berkeley: University of California / Meiji-Shobo.
Rafiei Mehrabadi, A. (1973). National monuments of Isfahan (No. 101). Tehran: Ettehad Printing. (In Persian)
Razani, M. (2009). Technical study of two sets of tile frames in Chehel Sotoun Museum. Restoration Science and Cultural Heritage, 2(3), 1–12. (In Persian) https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20131130084025-9874-23.pdf
Sālehi Kākhki, A., & Aslāni, H. (2011). Presentation of 12 kinds of stucco works used in the architectural decoration of the Islamic period in Iran based on technical properties. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 3(1), 89–1069. (In Persian) https://jarcs.ut.ac.ir/article_28697.html
Sarre, F. (1924). Aardabil Grabmoschee des schech Safi: Denkmaler persischer Baukunst (Teil II). Berlin.
Tajvidi, A. (1984). Continuity in Iranian architecture. In A. Javadi (Ed.), Collection of essays on Iranian architecture (pp. 11–35). Tehran: Mojarad Publications. (In Persian)
Tinati, T., Hamzavi, Y., Holakuee, P., & Colombini, M. P. (2020). Structural study of the pastiglia and gilding decoration at the Vank Cathedral and Bethlehem Church in Isfahan. Journal of Restoration Archaeology (JRA), 6(2), 25–39. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.52547/jra.6.2.25
Weaver, M. E. (1976). Preliminary study on conservation issues of five historical monuments in Iran (K. Afsar, Trans.). Tehran: National Organization for Preservation of Historical Monuments. (In Persian)
Yaqoubzadeh, H., & Hamzavi, Y. (2025). Characterization of mortar and colored layers in the inscription of the tomb of Amin al-Din Jibraeil in Kalkhuran, Ardebil. Journal of Research on Archaeometry; 11(1). (In Persian) DOI: 10.61186/jra.11.1.418